Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
30th April 2012
This morning Sir Paul Coleridge said, that having adjudicated on hundreds of divorces he wants to let people know that they shouldn’t give up so easily on their marriages. His view is that divorce is the scourge of our generation. I am not sure if it is a scourge but it is pretty much common place. I and other therapists working with Divorce Support Group see hundreds of people suffering from the impact of divorce and separation. The impact is devastating and has repercussions and consequences for not only the individuals themselves but also for children,grandchildren,grandparents,friends and other family members. The
consequences of divorce can last, if not negotiated properly a very longtime. Do I agree then, that people should work harder on their marriages? No-one I have seen over very many years, has ever left their marriage easily. Those who have been left have no choice because their partner has simply made the decision for both ofthem. Those who have done the leaving have not done so lightly. Usually, therehave been many years of unhappiness, where couple counselling has been sought and tried, where the couple have tried and tried again to make it work. I just don’t see that people choose to walk out on a marriage in an easy way, like choosing a new pair of shoes or which country to visit for a holiday. It’s not like that. It is really important that if it is possible to stay together then it’s best if they can but if it’s not, then an amicable reasonable divorce is what needs to happen. Years ago, people spent lifetimes in unhappy relationships. Now they don’t. People are free of societal expectation and can therefore leave. That doesn’t mean that it is done easily.
Tags: divorce and marriage, marriage given up too easily, Sir Paul Coleridge
Posted in Celebrity Divorce, Uncategorized
No Comments »
23rd March 2012
There is an article in today’s Daily Mail containing research on whether divorce statistics are affected by whether people live together first or not. In the 60’s people who lived together before they married had a much higher chance of divorce than
they do today. The study’s author says this is because co-habiting today is much more common and therefore doesn’t affect the success of subsequent marriage.
The article also details how cohabitation with and without engagement affects the divorce rates, however it would be really interesting to hear about how rates are affected by the different lengths of time people live together prior to marriage.
There are several people who have come to Divorce Support Group whose wives or husbands have left within 2 years of getting married after they have cohabited for anything between 5 and 10 years before the marriage. I think there is a correlation between the length of cohabitation and the statistics associated with divorce. My view is that when people live together for a long time, they usually do so because one, if not both of them find the institution of marriage an intimacy too far.
That is, although cohabitation is absolute commitment and meaningful, there is something about marriage which is a little more intimate and dependent and therefore potentially more claustrophobic than living together. It is harder to extricate yourself. Many people cohabit successfully for their lifetimes, but there is a question mark over why people then marry after such a long time of living together. Living together for these couples somehow seems safer and less threatening to the relationship. Taking the next step and marrying after a decade often is one step too far.
Tags: cohabitation and divorce, Divorce and cohabitation, divorce statistics
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
22nd March 2012
As a psychotherapist specialising in Divorce and Separation, I was really interested to read about the Divorce Hotel in the Netherlands. My
initial response was to think that it must be a gimmick. The idea is that two people who are well intentioned enough to want an amicable separation book into the hotel and with the help of a mediator dismantle their joint lives and stay friends in the
process. How does this happen, when mediation doesn’t always achieve this and when hostility makes it extremely difficult to have a non-contentious divorce?
Firstly, although we can assume that those couples booking into the divorce hotel already have the prospect of success on their side as they are both heading for the same goal,that doesn’t answer all of it.
In therapy,as in many disciplines, the setting in which an event or a meeting takes place is an integral part of a desired outcome. I can see then, how an ambient environment which is a normalised familiar environment, one which provides good wine, good food and comfortable surroundings will go a long way to facilitating a harmonious outcome. Anything which makes the overwhelming painful event of divorce easier, has to be good, but I can’t help but think (mutually desired outcomes aside), that a weekend is insufficient to process and mourn an enormous loss.
Perhaps dealing with the practical side of divorce – the assets and the children, takes away much of the worry and anxiety associated with the break up itself, but it won’t take away the overwhelming involuntary emotions, the sleeplessness, the lack of
concentration, the inability to think straight, the loss of self-esteem and the
feeling of being alone and isolated. The practical aspects of divorce are only a small part of a bigger picture. Getting a legal divorce is one thing, getting an emotional one is entirely another.
I like the idea of the divorce hotel. It can be a place where
divorce doesn’t need to be synonymous with hostility and acrimony. It can be a place where the couple and all they own is split and they can exit as separate but amicable individuals. My only concern is that on exit as separate individuals, each person takes time to deal with their own personal experience of pain in order to achieve their
emotional divorce and see that divorce is not only an end it is also a new
beginning. A weekend may be enough time to divorce on paper. It is nowhere near enough time to divorce emotionally.
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
7th March 2012
In the wake of the launch of the Debrett’s ‘Guide To A Civilised Divorce’, the
Telegraph ran a story on ‘How NOT to make your ex your enemy’,
in which I am quoted. Is there such as thing as an amicable divorce? In my
opinion, there can be, although this does not mean it is pain free. To reach an amicable divorce settlement, there needs to be mutual compromise, and if one party feels they have been deeply wronged this can be extremely tough. They have compromised enough already, they feel. You can read the full article here http://tinyurl.com/7vvhzfb
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
27th February 2012
The Sunday Telegraph Stella Magazine wrote a good article on the new Debretts Guide to Civilised Separation. You can read the article and my comments here: http://tgr.ph/x3iElT
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
3rd November 2011
The Family Justice Review which was published today has rejected calls from campaigners for father’s rights. Those calls sought for the review to recommend legislation that made it clear that a child should have a meaningful relationship with both parents and that both parents should have equal contact rights.
The fact that the review has failed to do that, does not in my view mean that a child should not have a meaningful relationship with both parents, it means that it is not written in law. What is statutory is the Children Act which puts the welfare of the child first. That means that any court, hearing a dispute about where children should live or how much contact they should have with each parent has to look at the children’s needs first. It is the children’s rights which are being looked at, not the parents.
However, I completely understand Families need Fathers and Fathers for Justice responses to this review. They feel that their cause of wanting to have equal rights to their children has been set back. Fathers have successfully campaigned to put their name on the residence and contact map over the past few years. What campaigners understandably feel is that a child’s right to have a meaningful relationship with both parents has not been supported by this review and that not to enforce it by statute means that many fathers will lose out when they want to spend more time with their children.
The fact is that neither parents rights are enshrined in law, only the child’s rights are and that is legislated for by the Court looking at what is in the best interests of the child. What fathers are saying is that the Courts seem to find in favour of the child spending more time with their mothers than with their fathers and that if a mother really is opposed to contact, then apart from the threat (sometimes carried out) of removing a child from the care of the mother into the care of the father, the father is out of the picture. Fathers feel that this Review will mean that they will go back to feeling marginalised.
The Review’s reasons for not enshrining in law parents rights is that the Court needs to look at the child’s needs and that is what they do. The Review also envisages that if there is a right to a meaningful relationship with both parents, then there will be much more litigation as fathers will issue applications for contact or residence of their children quoting just that. It will also mean that there will be much litigation over what ‘a meaningful relationship actually means.’ The review is seeking to avoid more acrimonious litigation and wants parents to come to their own arrangements. Whilst that is clearly a good idea, people only resort to going to court when they are desperate. It is only in those cases that fathers feel that they need some support from the Law in order to play a real part in their children’s lives.
Tags: childrens rights, contact and residence, family justice review, fathers rights, welfare of children
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
5th September 2011
Having given a short interview to Linda Kelsey – Journalist on the Daily Mail, I was interested to read her article published today http://bit.ly/qWPiY6. Are we all about love and forgiveness now and finding a way to move on? As I said before, I think there are many reasons for people leaving each other and filing for divorce and infidelity is a big one. To talk about infidelity perhaps losing its sting is to underestimate and perhaps ignore the huge devastation that discovering infidelity brings. Infidelity does not have to be the end of the relationship. Many celebrity indiscretions are forgiven and we see couples in the public eye soldiering on – Wayne and Colleen, David and Posh, Strauss Kahn and his wife, but whatever the public face of this seems to be, the private face is almost unbearable for many people. Yes, find a way through if you can – privately and with help, but the fact that it is more commonplace and more talked about does not in any way diminish its painful impact.
Tags: betrayal, coping with betrayal, coping with infidelity, infidelity, reaons for ending a marriage.
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
1st September 2011
I was interested to read the article in several of the papers yesterday about the reasons that people are giving for divorce. The article in the Guardian http://bit.ly/ppRZAO says that fewer people are citing adultery as their primary reason for divorce and more people are citing falling out of love. Many people who come to our groups have left their partners because of the unbearable pain of discovering their partner’s infidelity. Discovery usually comes as a brutal shock and calls into question all those shared experiences that have been taken for granted. Trust flies out of the window as does all sense of self esteem. So, does it always have to be the death knell of a marriage?
It is a long way back from infidelity to recreating a trusting relationship but people do it. Sometimes infidelity is a person’s way of saying that they haven’t been happy and something is missing (not always sex) perhaps emotional needs not being met. If it is a ‘protest statement’ and both people feel that there is something to salvage and are willing to try then with help things can be fixed. It is often not the physical act itself (although the thought of a loved one being with someone else is painful enough) but the lack of communication by the betraying partner that things have gone so badly wrong, that they are looking elsewhere that is often the most difficult thing for people to understand. Many people feel that they had no idea that anything was wrong until the moment of discovery. Often people say that others viewed them as the perfect couple and they are therefore left bewildered and confused.
There are many reasons for infidelity and there can be many reasons to stay together. Sometimes, it is a way out and the unfaithful partner is using it as a reason for leaving. However, sometimes it is a message about something neglected in the marriage and if it is possible to listen to the message and use it together to grow stronger then with a leap of faith, a lot of help, a wish to invest in something that was good it doesn’t have to break up a marriage.
Posted in Uncategorized
No Comments »
18th July 2011
This weekend I went to a wedding of a couple in their early fifites. Both had been married before and both had children from their previous marriages. This wedding seemed to be different from other second weddings I had been to. It was a full on, huge event that might have been more in keeping with a first wedding of a couple in their 20s. It went on from 5.30pm to 1am. There were drinks, dancing, dinner, more dancing, more food and finally the end. 200 of their friends all of us in our fifties brought together by the union of this couple. I was trying to think what it was that made this so different. There was no apology or embarrassment about the fact that this was the second marriage and no attempt at being apologetic for the extravanganza. It was a celebration, but the most extraordinary thing was that the new husband had his ex wife there. She was really lovely and spent the evening, smiling and dancing and seemed genuinely happy to wish him and his new wife well. Their children moved between the groom and their mother really easily and both of them made a speech. The new wife’s 10 year old daughter also made a speech, saying she was glad that her step dad was so nice and that he wasn’t like the ones in the movies and she finished by saying ‘I know I shouldn’t say this, but this time, please don’t ruin it!.’ The new wife’s first husband on hearing that she was going to marry again, said how happy he was for her and I think had she wanted to invite him, he would have been thrilled to attend. I write about this, because I think it is rare and a testament to this particular couple. They had both been through the huge wrench of divorce and come through it, but on that journey they had both taken the decision to not make a bad situation worse and had preserved the essence of a relationship with their ex partners despite the hurt and the pain. Out of the gloom and darkness they had maintained a dignity, which is the respect that the other was someone they once loved and who was still a parent to their children. It was that dignity and empathy for the other even though both the bride and groom had been hugely hurt by their ex’s that meant they could fully embrace their new lives together and keep something of their old ones. I thought it was remarkable.
Posted in Uncategorized
5 Comments »